Shopping cart

Lagoscityreporters.com is a web-based news and entertainment portal established to deliver cutting edge, incisive and knowledge-driven journalism practicelagoscityreporters.com is mandated to drive this vision through online journalism.

TnewsTnews
  • Home
  • News
  • Rivers: Group Rejects Tinubu’s State Of Emergency, Suspension Of Governor, Deputy
News

Rivers: Group Rejects Tinubu’s State Of Emergency, Suspension Of Governor, Deputy

6
Pro-democracy and civil rights advocacy group: HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has condemned the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, the usurpation of the constitutional powers of the state governor and the House of Assembly by the illegal appointment of a military administrator in Rivers state is the same thing as the military takeovers that happened in neighbouring West African nations of Niger, Mali,Burkina Faso.
“HURIWA absolutely rejects the unconstitutional exercise of strange and undemocratic powers of suspension as announced by the president who was similarly elected and inaugurated just like the governors and legislators in the Houses of Assembly.
“This unconstitutional takeover of another branch of government in Rivers state under Governor Siminalayi Fubara by an elected civilian president and his grotesque, nebulous and sham decision to bring back a retired Naval chief to exercise the same powers of an elected governor is a calculated attempt to establish a dictatorship.
“Unfortunately, the judiciary in Nigeria is in the pockets of the presidency and some key ministers. So it is unlikely that an independent and the correct pronouncement on this illegal declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers state can be determined under this toxic atmosphere of complete state capture.”
Besides, HURIWA said the decision by the president smacks of filthy hypocrisy because we in the HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA just like many patriotic citizens can still recall
that few years back when President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States in May 2013, Jonathan rightly jettisoned the illegal counsels of some power grabbers to remove the elected governors and dissolve other democratic structures in the affected states. Tinubu who was in the opposition political party flatly condemned President Goodluck Jonathan.
HURIWA affirmed categorically that a plethora of constitutional provisions, back our assertion that State tier of government do not answer to the Federal government as they are separate and  coexists as a Federation and the President has only authority over federal cabinet and any attempt to usurp and collapse the power of an elected governor even if temporarily is unlawful and should be rejected by the National Assembly. The President even in exercising the powers donated to his office in section 305 of the Constitution, lacks the legal powers to suspend another elected head of a branch of government inaugurated under the provisions of the Grund Norm.
HURIWA a Pro-democracy Advocacy organization, expressed deep concern that this unlawful suspension sets a toxic and very dangerous precedent for a power crazy dictator  masked as democratocally elected president even as we are convinced that a state of emergency in Rivers state is uncalled for since there is no clear evidence of any total breakdown of law and order.
We think that since the Rivers state House of Assembly whose majority of the members are loyalists of the minister of the FCT, had made it impossible for governor Siminialayi Fubara to present the 2025 budget, the national assembly has the power to take over powers of state assembly and allowing it to be hijacked by the federal executive Council in which one of the prominent protagonists in the political instability in Rivers state is a member (minister of FCT) amounts to  a coup against democracy.
We wholeheartedly restate that President Bola Tinubu has no power to suspend a governor but if he was enthusiastic of exercising such a power, then he could have directed it to his minister who was one of those stoking up the fire of political warfare and was behind the rebellious Rivers state House of Assembly who engineered an illegal plot to unseat governor Fubara.
HURIWA affirms in solidarity with like minded patriots, that the suspension of a sitting Governor under the guise of a state of emergency encapsulated in section 305(1) of the Constitution is an illegal and unconstitutional act, and is simply  a coup against democracy.
HURIWA emphasized that since the Supreme Court made the controversial judgment, Governor Fubara had vigourously adopted all the right steps towards implementing the decision but unfortunately the recalcitrant 27 members of the Rrivers State House of Assembly loyal to the FCT minister, decidedly undermined and sabotaged every steps made by the Rivers state governor to comply with the judgment because they were actually hoping to create the phantom instability to allow the biased and one-sided president to make an attempt to unseat the governor illegally which has just happened. This whole declaration of a state of emergency is an unmitigated charade which should be voided.
HURIWA said evidence abound that the Rivers state Governor wrote another letter to the 27-members legislators loyal to Wike and these loyalists of Nyesom Wike claimed that they  have gone on recess on Friday evening only for these same set of legislators who vacated on Friday evening to be flown into PortHarcourt on Monday to claim they have commenced a purported impeachment with the subterranean motive to frustrate governance in Rivers State under Governor Fubara.
“This suspension is in Violation of Section 1(2) of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended) The Constitution expressly prohibits any forceful takeover of government outside democratic and constitutional processes: The Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.” Suspending a sitting governor violates this provision, as no state of emergency grants the President the power to remove or suspend a duly elected official.
“The nation’s apex court has consistently ruled that the declaration of a state of emergency does not empower the President to remove elected officials during the period of the emergency. In the case of A.G. Federation v. A.G. Lagos State (2013) LPELR-20974(SC), the Supreme Court ruled that: “Under no circumstances shall the democratic structures be suspended or dissolved, even in a state of emergency.” In the case of A.G. Plateau State v. A.G. Federation (2006), the Supreme Court invalidated the removal of elected officials during a state of emergency in Plateau State.
“In 2013, former President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa states, yet: He did not remove or suspend the governors. He stated that “all democratic structures remain intact” while security operations intensified.”
The Constitution is unequivocal in its provisions regarding the removal of a duly elected governor. Section 188 clearly outlines the impeachment process, which is the sole legal mechanism for removing a governor, and it is exclusively the prerogative of the State House of Assembly. Nowhere in the Constitution is the President granted the authority to suspend a governor or their deputy.
Besides, Section 11(4) and (5) of the Constitution allows the National Assembly to intervene in the affairs of a State House of Assembly only in cases where the Assembly is unable to perform its functions due to crisis. Even in such circumstances, this provision does not extend to suspending an elected governor or deputy. Additionally, Section 308 grants immunity to governors and their deputies from civil or criminal proceedings while in office, which absolutely renders the so-called suspension of the governor and his deputy a nullity.
HURIWA said the constitutional provisions on the declaration of a state of emergency by the President did not give the president the power to suspend a governor.
Specifically, in Chapter 8. Part 2. Section 305. Procedure for proclamation of state of emergency
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the President may by instrument published in the Official -Gazette} of the Government of the Federation issue a Proclamation of a state of emergency in the Federation or any part thereof.
(2) The President shall immediately after the publication, transmit copies of the Official ¬Gazette of the Government of the Federation containing the proclamation including the details of the emergency to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, each of whom shall forthwith convene or arrange for a meeting of the House of which he is President or Speaker, as the case may be, to consider the situation and decide whether or not to pass a resolution approving the Proclamation.
(3) The President shall have power to issue a Proclamation of a state of emergency only when ¬
(a) the Federation is at war;
(b) the Federation is in imminent danger of invasion or involvement in a state of war;
(c) there is actual breakdown of public order and public safety in the Federation or any part thereof to such extent as to require extraordinary measures to restore peace and security;
(d) there is a clear and present danger of an actual breakdown of public order and public safety in the Federation or any part thereof requiring extraordinary measures to avert such danger;
(e) there is an occurrence or imminent danger, or the occurrence of any disaster or natural calamity, affecting the community or a section of the community in the Federation;
(f) there is any other public danger which clearly constitutes a threat to the existence of the Federation; or
(g) the President receives a request to do so in accordance with the provisions of subsection (4) of this section.
(4) The Governor of a State may, with the sanction of a resolution supported by two-thirds majority of the House of Assembly, request the President to issue a Proclamation of a state of emergency in the State when there is in existence within the State any of the situations specified in subsection (3) (c), (d) and (e) of this section and such situation does not extend beyond the boundaries of the State.
(5) The President shall not issue a Proclamation of a state of emergency in any case to which the provisions of subsection (4) of this section apply unless the Governor of the State fails within a reasonable time to make a request to the President to issue such Proclamation.
(6) A Proclamation issued by the President under this section shall cease to have effect ¬
(a) if it is revoked by the President by instrument published in the Official Gazette of the Government of the Federation;
(b) if it affects the Federation or any part thereof and within two days when the National Assembly is in session, or within ten days when the National Assembly is not in session, after its publication, there is no resolution supported by two-thirds majority of all the members of each House of the National Assembly approving the Proclamation;
(c) after a period of six months has elapsed since it has been in force: Provided that the National Assembly may, before the expiration of the period of six months aforesaid, extend the period for the Proclamation of the state of emergency to remain in force from time to time for a further period of six months by resolution passed in like manner; or
(d) at any time after the approval referred to in paragraph (b) or the extension referred to in paragraph (c) of this subsection, when each House of the National Assembly revokes the Proclamation by a simple majority of all the members of each House.

Comments are closed

Related Posts